[x]

Browse More Like This

Download Image
JPG, 1210×586 more ▶

More from *uriska

View Gallery · View Prints

Featured in Groups:

Not currently featured in any groups.

Details

Submitted: May 14, 2011
Image Size: 270 KB
Resolution: 1210×586

Link

Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 2
Favourites: 36 [who?]
Views: 779 (0 today)
Downloads: 92 (0 today)

[x]

Not my work againby *uriska

Scraps

Please check out the website for the original, it is down at the bottom right corner

www.penemenn.com

~~love 0 0~~

joy 1 1

~~wow 0 0~~

~~mad 0 0~~

~~sad 0 0~~

~~fear 0 0~~

~~neutral 0 0~~

*fabianfucci May 14, 2011 Professional Filmographer

Hi again, the technique applied here is correct, as the vanishing point for the corridor running backwards at left isn't shown located at the geometrical center of the corridor itself. That angles the corridor right, and communicates a right feeling of depth. Here, the technique has been stretched out near its limits, but not going overboard.

I wouldn't like much to turn this talk into technicalities, as your work is impressive even with that slight minor thing to point out (I guess only a modification in that area is needed to make your deviation really rock it out). I hope this helps somehow.

*uriska May 14, 2011

The only difference technically, between this one and mine is the distance of those two radiating vanishing points. If you draw the horizon line you will discover it. Otherwise, he did this more extreme than I do, everything looks extreme so that one thinks he did this on purpose, while my other vanishing point is far away and you cannot see it on the picture.
You can probably try to match the edge to see where the vanishing point is

More from *uriska

Featured in Groups:

Details

Statistics

Not my work againby *uriska

The Journal Portal

Polls

What is your preferred drawing software?

deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]

Keep in Touch!

Deviousness

Add Media

Style